An Eye-Opening Experience
This
summer has been an incredible eye-opening experience! When I interviewed
for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Intern position, I was unsure as to what to
expect. I had a broad understanding of Pennsylvania Legal Services, but was
unaware of the break down of the particular field and specialty programs.
Following my interview by Rhodia, not only did my knowledge of Pennsylvania
Legal Services greatly increase, but I was struck by her passion in working
on behalf of low-income individuals.
Just hours after
commencing my Martin Luther King, Jr. internship with the Pennsylvania
Utility Law Project did I realize that not only Rhodia, but everyone in the
Harrisburg branch of Pennsylvania Legal Services was filled with her same
passion day in and day out. I have interned with two other law offices (one
was a large, international law firm, and the other was a one attorney
practice) and not one individual exhibited the charisma or devotion to their
clients as is present with Pennsylvania Legal Services.
Working with Harry
Geller has been both an informative and rewarding experience. Participation
in legislative and administrative advocacy is probably the most accurate
description of the Pennsylvania Utility Law Project (PULP). Throughout the
summer, I attended a variety of meetings that all dealt with utility law
issues. These meetings were held at the Public Utility Commission, the
Health and Welfare Building, the Energy Association, and at PECO’s central
office in Philadelphia. This is an exciting time period in utility law
because of the recent deregulation, which allows for and encourages local
competition. Consider, for example, the Council for Utility Choice which is
a non-profit corporation working in conjunction with the Pennsylvania Public
Utility Commission. The Council educates consumers by providing them with
natural gas, electric, and telephone shopping guides. This information
allows consumers to compare utility prices among the various local utility
companies to make an informed decision when selecting a particular utility.
Other activities in
which I participated include: client meetings, attending Dauphin County
court proceedings (such as Protection from Abuse hearings and Domestic
Relations hearings), and presenting testimony on behalf of the Pennsylvania
Energy Assistance and Weatherization Coalition (PEAWC). The testimony on
behalf of PEAWC was provided in response to the 2003 Proposed Low-Income
Home Energy Assistance Program State Plan and with the hope that it would
assist the Department of Public Welfare develop the most effective system
for the administration of energy assistance.
Lastly, this summer I
conducted a Lifeline outreach project. Lifeline is a federally funded
discount telephone program for low-income consumers. I researched
individual state Lifeline programs for the purpose of learning how eligible
individuals are informed of the program. The ultimate goal was to increase
the Lifeline participation in Pennsylvania by improving upon outreach
efforts in the Commonwealth. Fortunately, I was asked to work with the
Public Utility Commission to help design a Lifeline brochure, with plans for
statewide distribution.
My direct client work,
my participation in utility law legislative, and administrative advocacy, as
well as my understanding of Pennsylvania Legal Services employees’ charisma
has provided me with a three dimensional perspective of the law. These
experiences cannot be duplicated. They have given me more insight into this
world of the most vulnerable than any law school course could possibly
accomplish.
Adele McDonald
Pennsylvania Utility Law Project